Students
مصاريف
تاريخ البدء
وسيلة الدراسة
مدة
حقائق البرنامج
تفاصيل البرنامج
درجة
الماجستير
تخصص رئيسي
Biochemistry | Biotechnology | Molecular Biology
التخصص
العلوم
لغة الدورة
إنجليزي
عن البرنامج

نظرة عامة على البرنامج


Program Overview

The 5MT004 Degree Project in Molecular Life Science VT23 is a university program that has been evaluated based on various aspects.


Program Evaluation

The program evaluation is based on the responses from 14 participants, with an answer count of 5 and an answer frequency of 35.71%.


Development of Valuable Expertise/Skills

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which they developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a large extent: 2 (40.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 3 (60.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.6, with a standard deviation of 0.5 and a coefficient of variation of 11.9%.

Achievement of Intended Learning Outcomes

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which they achieved the intended learning outcomes of the course.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a large extent: 3 (60.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 2 (40.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.4, with a standard deviation of 0.5 and a coefficient of variation of 12.4%.

Common Theme Throughout the Course

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which there was a common theme running throughout the course.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 2 (40.0%)
    • to a large extent: 2 (40.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 1 (20.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 3.8, with a standard deviation of 0.8 and a coefficient of variation of 22.0%.

Promotion of Scientific Way of Thinking and Reasoning

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which the course promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 1 (20.0%)
    • to a large extent: 3 (60.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 1 (20.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.0, with a standard deviation of 0.7 and a coefficient of variation of 17.7%.

Openness of Teachers to Ideas and Opinions

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which the teachers were open to ideas and opinions about the course's structure and content.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 1 (20.0%)
    • to a large extent: 2 (40.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 2 (40.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.2, with a standard deviation of 0.8 and a coefficient of variation of 19.9%.

Reasonableness of Workload

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which the workload during the course was reasonable in relation to the extent of the course
    umber of credits awarded.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 1 (20.0%)
    • to a large extent: 3 (60.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 1 (20.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.0, with a standard deviation of 0.7 and a coefficient of variation of 17.7%.

Relevance of Course Structure and Methods

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which the course structure and methods used were relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 3 (60.0%)
    • to a large extent: 2 (40.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 0 (0.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 3.4, with a standard deviation of 0.5 and a coefficient of variation of 16.1%.

Building Upon Previous Knowledge

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which the course built upon their knowledge from previous courses in the programme.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 1 (20.0%)
    • to some extent: 1 (20.0%)
    • to a large extent: 2 (40.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 1 (20.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 3.6, with a standard deviation of 1.1 and a coefficient of variation of 31.7%.

Relevance of Examination

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which the examination was relevant in relation to the learning outcomes.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 1 (20.0%)
    • to a large extent: 3 (60.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 1 (20.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.0, with a standard deviation of 0.7 and a coefficient of variation of 17.7%.

Responsibility for Own Learning

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which they took responsibility for their own learning during the course.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a large extent: 1 (20.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 4 (80.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.8, with a standard deviation of 0.4 and a coefficient of variation of 9.3%.

Guidance from Teachers

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which they could turn to their teacher/supervisor for guidance when they had questions or problems with the course content.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a large extent: 1 (20.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 4 (80.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.8, with a standard deviation of 0.4 and a coefficient of variation of 9.3%.

Importance of Feedback

  • The participants were asked to rate the extent to which the feedback they received was important for their development and learning.
    • to a very small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a small extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to some extent: 0 (0.0%)
    • to a large extent: 4 (80.0%)
    • to a very large extent: 1 (20.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.2, with a standard deviation of 0.4 and a coefficient of variation of 10.6%.

Overall Opinion of the Course

  • The participants were asked to rate their overall opinion of the course.
    • very poor: 0 (0.0%)
    • poor: 0 (0.0%)
    • ok: 0 (0.0%)
    • good: 3 (60.0%)
    • very good: 2 (40.0%)
  • The mean rating for this aspect is 4.4, with a standard deviation of 0.5 and a coefficient of variation of 12.4%.
عرض المزيد
How can I help you today?